Let's hear it for lunch
In keeping with this month's theme of how we adjust our budgets, I bring you the WSJ's "Bagging Lunch: the Inflation Effect." The lede:
A few months ago Jessie Snider, 23, began to feel the pinch of the rising cost of gasoline, food and, well, everything. Then she realized the $75 to $80 she was spending each week on lunch was really cutting into her paycheck. So in March she traded sit-down lunches of elaborate caprese salads and angel-hair pasta for brown-bag lunches of leftover stir-fry and turkey sandwiches.
A billion years ago, when I worked at Hotwired, the articles about the place almost invariably reported on the "personal chef" we had who cooked meals. Let me tell you a few things. First, Phil Ferrato is a genius; I still dream of his pasta dishes. Second, the meals were subsidized to the point where all you had to do was pay $3-4 per day for a good hot lunch with salad and a sweet. And third, those meals were usually my main meal of the day; I relied on them to stretch my budget.
So I'm sympathetic to the idea of a lunch outlay. But holy cats, I am a little boggled by the idea of spending $15-16 on lunch daily. For those of you who don't brown-bag -- is this the norm? What do you pay when you go out to lunch?
Recent Comments